Sector-Specific Competition Enforcement at the FCC
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) charge to promote the public interest in the communications sector encompasses a mandate to foster competition.1 The FCC is far from the only federal agency with an interest in competitive communications markets. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s generalist antitrust enforcers, also seek to ensure that communications markets (as well as all other industries) perform competitively. These Remarks explain how and why sector-specific enforcement by the FCC complements generalist competition enforcement to the benefit of competition in the communications industry. These Remarks also discuss the ways in which a sector-specific agency such as the FCC can foster competition and promote other public goals, and compare merger reviews by the DOJ and the FCC in the wake of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.2 One might expect to see little difference in how the competitive effects of mergers are analyzed at the FCC versus the DOJ and the FTC. After all, the economists at these agencies have similar training and think about industrial organization economics in the same way. Indeed, some FCC economists have previously worked at
منابع مشابه
Protection of Business and Production of Private Sector in Enforcement Proceedings
Forced enforcement of judicial decisions such as seizure causes difficulties in the production cycle. There are no restrictions on the seizure in the enforcement of sentences against production centers, including legal entities, and the determination of the type of property for seizure is belonged to winner and in contrast to the real persons, the rule of "immunity" is not identified for them. ...
متن کاملCALEA and Network Security
W iretaps have been used since the invention of the telegraph and have been a legal element of the US law enforcement arsenal for more than a quarter century. In keeping with law enforcement’s efforts to keep laws current with changing technologies, in 1994 the US Congress passed the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The law proved to be controversial because it mandate...
متن کاملRegulatory Reform : The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the FCC Media Ownership Rules
The Federal Communications Commission has regulated ownership of mass media outlets since the 1920s. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 abolished some of these regulations, changed others, and required the FCC to review its rules regularly and to repeal those no longer required. There is little opposition to the idea that media ownership policy should promote economic competition (to increase t...
متن کاملCompetition In Iran’s Banking Sector: Panzar-Rosse Approach
The Iranian banking sector has undergone huge and substantial reform in the last decade; privatization, establishment of private banks and development of modern technologies (IT). This paper investigates the competitive condition of the Iranian banking industry over the period 2005-2010 using the H-statistic proposed by Panzar and Rosse. The properties of this non-structural methodology make it...
متن کاملنقش حقوق رقابت در بهبود سلامت عمومی
Competition as an important incentive for innovation leads to freedom of choice and price reduction and contributes to more rapid provision of new and effective therapeutic technologies. On the other hand, anti-competitive practices adopted by economic undertakings in the health sector may disrupt competition including limited access to medicines and medical services or increase in their price....
متن کامل